Legal Opinion

Colich & Sons v. Pacific Bell

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 25, 1988No. B023012PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

THOMPSON, J.

This is an appeal by Colich & Sons et. al (Colich) from the dismissal of a cross-complaint against Pacific Bell (Pac Bell) for indemnity, comparative contribution and declaratory relief following the sustaining of a demurrer without leave to amend.

We hold that a defendant, such as Colich, consistent with the policy that limitation of liability provisions in a tariff are binding on the public generally, is barred from seeking equitable indemnity for ordinary negligence from a concurrently negligent telephone utility, even though the defendant is not a customer of the…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Nga Li v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1975
  2. American Motorcycle Assn. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Goodman v. KennedyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Buckaloo v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Bigbee v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.California Supreme Court · 1983

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. City of Santa Barbara v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Western Steamship Lines, Inc. v. San Pedro Peninsula HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Calvillo-Silva v. Home GroceryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Prince v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Decker v. City of Imperial BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API