Colich & Sons v. Pacific Bell
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
THOMPSON, J.
This is an appeal by Colich & Sons et. al (Colich) from the dismissal of a cross-complaint against Pacific Bell (Pac Bell) for indemnity, comparative contribution and declaratory relief following the sustaining of a demurrer without leave to amend.
We hold that a defendant, such as Colich, consistent with the policy that limitation of liability provisions in a tariff are binding on the public generally, is barred from seeking equitable indemnity for ordinary negligence from a concurrently negligent telephone utility, even though the defendant is not a customer of the…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Nga Li v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1975
- American Motorcycle Assn. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Goodman v. KennedyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Buckaloo v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Bigbee v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.California Supreme Court · 1983
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- City of Santa Barbara v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- Western Steamship Lines, Inc. v. San Pedro Peninsula HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- Calvillo-Silva v. Home GroceryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- Prince v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 2009
- Decker v. City of Imperial BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.