Legal Opinion

Vila v. Tahoe Southside Water Utility

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 6, 1965No. Civ. 10992PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPierce, P. J.

The issue we decide on this appeal is whether the superior court has jurisdiction under Public Utilities Code section 2106 1 over an action brought by a prospective water user (1) for a mandatory injunction commanding a water company, which is a public utility, to provide water service in accordance with its unambiguous schedule of rates and rules and regulations on file with the California Public Utilities Commission (hereinafter the “commission”), (2) for compensatory damages for refusal so to provide service, and (3) for exemplary damages because of the utility’s alleged wilful refusal so…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Railroad v. International Coal Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Truck Owners & Shippers, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Miller v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  4. California Adj. Co. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Ry.California Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Clemmons v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Gay Law Students Ass'n v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.California Supreme Court · 1979
  2. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Waters v. Pacific Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Behrend v. Bell Telephone Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. Hartwell Corporation v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API