Barasch v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NIX, Chief Justice.
Before us are two consolidated appeals questioning the right of a public utility to recover certain costs from its ratepayers. We are called upon to decide whether section 1315 of the Public Utility Code (“Code”), 66 Pa.C.S. § 1315, bars an electric utility from amortizing costs incurred in connection with plant-construction projects which were can-celled prior to completion, and whether, if the statute must be so read, it violates constitutional safeguards. We must also determine whether vacant land, purportedly held by a utility company “for future use,” is…
2Cases cited76 opinions
- Plyler v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- F. S. Royster Guano Co. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Usery v. Turner Elkhorn Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Smyth v. AmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Chase Securities Corp. v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- Commonwealth v. RiveraSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Duquesne Light Co. v. BaraschSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Phoenixville Hospital v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Kohl v. New Sewickley Township Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- In re Wabash Valley Power Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.