Legal Opinion

In re H.A.M.

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided July 10, 1998No. 79,562PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pierron, J.:

K.H. (the natural mother of H.A.M., J.F.D., and W.D.M.) and D.M. (the natural father of H.A.M. and W.D.M.) appeal the termination of their parental rights. They allege the trial court failed to comply with the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA), 25 U.S.C. 1901 et seq. (1994), and the State failed to produce evidence to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the return of the children to their parents would result in significant harm to the children.

On November 4, 1994, the State filed child in need of care petitions for H.A.M., J.F.D., and W.D.M. The children were placed in protective…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. HolyfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. In The Interest of S.M.Q.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1990
  3. In Re the Adoption of RiffleMontana Supreme Court · 1995
  4. People in Interest of P.B.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Matter of Adoption of RiffleMontana Supreme Court · 1996

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Valerie M. v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityArizona Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Brown County v. Shannon R.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
  3. In the Interest of W.D.H.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2001
  4. People ex rel. S.R.M.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. In the Interest of M.H.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2014

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API