In the Interest of M.H.
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Leben, J.:
Father, E.H, appeals from the district court’s order terminating his parental rights to M.H. He argues that the district court erred in two ways: (1) by failing to notify M.H.’s potential Indian tribe in compliance with the procedures outlined in the Indian Child Welfare Act (the Act) and its accompanying guidelines; and (2) by holding that clear and convincing evidence supported finding him unfit to parent M.H.
Father is correct that the Act requires that a party seeking to terminate the parental rights of a child that may be Native American must follow specific procedures for…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State v. WardSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011
- In the Interest of B.D.-Y.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2008
- In re K.B.Montana Supreme Court · 2013
- In re MorrisMichigan Supreme Court · 2012
- In the Interest of H.D.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- In re D.G.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2024
- In re Estate of FieldCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2018
- In re A.C.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2020
- In re A.P.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2020
- In re A.P.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2020
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.