Legal Opinion

Matter of Adoption of Riffle

Montana Supreme Court

Decided July 30, 1996No. 96-076PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Leaphart

Appellants, Kenneth and Clara Siroky (the Sirokys), appeal from the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and Order of the Tenth Judicial District Court, Fergus County, concluding that Jessica Lynn Riffle (Jessica) is an Indian child and that, pursuant to the Indian Child Welfare Act, 25 U.S.C. §§ 1901 to 1963 (the ICWA), Jessica’s uncle, John Garlick (Garlick) gets the benefit of an adoptive placement preference. We affirm.

The Sirokys present four issues on appeal:

1. Is Jessica an “Indian child” as defined by the ICWA?

2. Does application of the ICWA deny Jessica her constitutional rights?

3.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. HolyfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Steer, Inc. v. Department of RevenueMontana Supreme Court · 1990
  3. In re M.E.M. Youth in Need of CareMontana Supreme Court · 1981
  4. In Re the Adoption of F.H.Alaska Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Matter of Baby Boy DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of SkillenMontana Supreme Court · 1998
  2. A.D.T. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2008
  3. In re C.H.Montana Supreme Court · 2000
  4. People Ex Rel. A.N.W.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. In Re CHMontana Supreme Court · 2000

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API