Valerie M. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BALES, Justice.
¶ 1 Under Arizona law, parental rights may be terminated if clear and convincing evidence establishes a statutorily identified ground, such as abandonment or neglect, and a preponderance of the evidence shows that termination is in the child’s best interests. We hold that the Indian Child Welfare Act (“ICWA”), 25 U.S.C. §§ 1901 to 1963 (2000), does not require these state-law findings to be made by a higher standard of proof in cases involving Indian children.
I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
¶2 This case concerns the termination of the parental rights of Valerie M. as…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Kent K. v. Bobby M.Arizona Supreme Court · 2005
- Cullen v. Auto-Owners InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 2008
- In Re Interest of Walter W.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. FletcherArizona Supreme Court · 1986
- In re J.R.B.Alaska Supreme Court · 1986
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Banks v. International Rental & Leasing Corp.Supreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2011
- Seisinger v. SiebelArizona Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. PiggSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
- Ruben M. v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
- Yvonne L. v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.