Hammonds, Inc. v. Flanders
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtSherburne, J.
This is an action in contract to recover a balance alleged to be due on account. The defendant pleaded the general issue and accord and satisfaction. Trial was by court and judgment was for the defendant, and the case comes up upon plaintiff’s exceptions.
Because the findings are meager, it is necessary to set forth what they show and to quote from them to some considerable extent in order properly to present the points made by the exceptions. “All items in specification, except interest items, were conceded subject to defendant’s claim of full payment. In support of his answer, defendant’s…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Francis v. London Guarantee & Accident Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1927
- O'Boyle v. Parker-Young Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1921
- Raithel Et Ux. v. HallSupreme Court of Vermont · 1925
- Rutland Railway, Light & Power Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1916
- Drown's Guardian v. Chesley's EstateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1917
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Thompson v. SmithSupreme Court of Vermont · 1957
- Amey v. HallSupreme Court of Vermont · 1962
- Larmay v. VanEttenSupreme Court of Vermont · 1971
- Sheldon v. LittleSupreme Court of Vermont · 1940
- State v. JostSupreme Court of Vermont · 1968
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.