State v. Layman
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.
Defendant appeals his conviction for unlawful possession of a controlled substance. ORS 475.992(4)(b). He assigns error to the court’s failure to suppress evidence obtained when officers inventoried the property in his possession during the booking process at a county jail. We reverse and remand.
Police arrested defendant on April 19, 1994, pursuant to a valid warrant and took him to the Lane County Adult Correctional Facility (LCACF). They booked him into that facility under the procedures specified in the LCACF manual. Those procedures included an inventory of the property in his possession.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. HolmesOregon Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. AtkinsonOregon Supreme Court · 1984
- Nelson v. Lane CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1987
- AFSCME Local 2623 v. Department of CorrectionsOregon Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. MundtCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. KetelsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- State v. LaymanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- State v. LaymanOregon Supreme Court · 1998