Legal Opinion

State v. Ketelson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 22, 1999No. 970747005; CA A101049PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.

Defendant appeals the denial of his motion to suppress evidence found during an inventory at the Hooper Detoxification Center. We affirm.

The police took defendant into custody pursuant to ORS 430.399(1) because he was intoxicated in a public place. They then took him to the Hooper Detoxification Center. On his arrival at the center, defendant’s clothes and shoes were removed pursuant to the facility’s inventory policy. A knife was found in defendant’s boot, which led to a charge against him for carrying a concealed weapon. ORS 166.240(1). Defendant moved to suppress the evidence of the knife,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. AtkinsonOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  2. State v. LaymanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  3. State v. LaymanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  4. State v. LaymanOregon Supreme Court · 1998

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Smith v. Washington CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  2. Weber v. Oakridge School District 76Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  3. State v. StoudamireCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  4. Weber v. Oakridge School District 76Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API