Legal Opinion

State v. Layman

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 25, 1999No. 10-94-07580; CA A87593PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.

The Supreme Court vacated and remanded our decision in this case for reconsideration in light of State v. Boone, 327 Or 307, 959 P2d 76 (1998). On remand, we affirm.

Defendant challenged the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence discovered during an inventory of his possessions on his incarceration at the Lane County Jail. The facts bearing on that challenge are set out in our original opinion. State v. Layman, 147 Or App 225, 935 P2d 1216 (1997). Defendant argued that the policy under which the jail officials had conducted the inventory had not been authorized by appropriate…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. AtkinsonOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  2. State v. BooneOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State v. CookCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  4. State v. LaymanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  5. State v. CookOregon Supreme Court · 1998

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. KetelsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API