Legal Opinion

Wilkes v. Freeman

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided February 1, 1999No. 2935PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOWELL, Chief Judge:

In this action, Grover and Lori Wilkes allege Horace Mann Insurance Company (Horace Mann) failed to provide a meaningful offer of underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage by failing to provide UIM coverage “up to” Lori Wilkes’s liability coverage limits. The circuit court refused to reform Lori Wilkes’s insurance policy to include UIM coverage. The Wilkeses appeal. We reverse.

L

In 1988, Lori Wilkes obtained an automobile liability insurance policy from Horace Mann. It provided bodily injury limits of $25,000 per person per accident with a maximum of $50,000 for all persons per…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Wannamaker Ex Rel. Estate of WannamakerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
  2. Butler v. Unisun InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
  3. Garris v. Cincinnati InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1984
  4. Hanover Insurance v. Horace Mann InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
  5. Osborne v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Progressive Casualty Insurance v. LeachmanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
  2. Rabb v. Catawba InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000
  3. Bower v. National General InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000
  4. Bower v. National General InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
  5. South Carolina Life & Accident & Health Insurance Guaranty Ass'n v. Liberty Life InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API