Legal Opinion

Rabb v. Catawba Insurance

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided February 22, 2000No. 3123PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEARN, Justice:

Doris S. Rabb appeals the circuit court’s grant of summary judgment to Catawba Insurance Company in her action to reform two insurance policies to provide underinsured (UIM) coverage. She contends Catawba’s offer of UIM coverage was not meaningful because, at the time of the offer, Catawba was not authorized to sell such coverage in amounts less than $15,000. We disagree and affirm.

FACTS/PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Doris Rabb was injured in an automobile accident on October 19, 1994. At the time of the accident, Rabb was a passenger in a vehicle driven by her daughter, Karen Rabb. The…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Wannamaker Ex Rel. Estate of WannamakerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
  2. Cafe Associates, Ltd. v. GerngrossSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  3. Butler v. Unisun InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
  4. McCall v. FinleyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1987
  5. Garris v. Cincinnati InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Smith v. South Carolina InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002
  2. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company v. William Powell Debbie Powell, Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company v. William Powell Debbie PowellCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2002
  3. Bower v. National General InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
  4. Burch v. South Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002
  5. Bower v. National General InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API