Legal Opinion

Bower v. National General Insurance

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 15, 2002No. 25493PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Waller

We granted the petition for a writ of certiorari to review the Court of Appeals’ decision in Bower v. National General Ins. Co., 342 S.C. 315, 536 S.E.2d 693 (Ct.App.2000). We affirm.

FACTS

Respondent Jason Bower was a passenger in his friend’s car when the vehicle was involved in an accident. Bower was injured in the accident, and he made an underinsured motorist (UIM) claim as an insured under his father’s policy with petitioner National General Insurance Company (National General). National General denied the claim based on the fact that Bower’s father had rejected its offer to purchase UIM…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Wannamaker Ex Rel. Estate of WannamakerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
  2. Hastings v. United Pacific Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  3. Butler v. Unisun InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
  4. Garris v. Cincinnati InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1984
  5. Hanover Insurance v. Horace Mann InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Progressive Casualty Insurance v. LeachmanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
  2. Grinnell Corp. v. WoodCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
  3. Cohen v. Progressive Northern InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2013
  4. Grinnell Corp. v. WoodCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
  5. United Services Automobile Ass'n v. LitchfieldCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API