Legal Opinion

Osborne v. Allstate Insurance

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided July 17, 1995No. 2377PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cureton, Judge:

Appellant, Sherri L. Osborne, brought declaratory judgment action, claiming Respondent, Allstate Insurance Company, failed to make an effective offer of underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage and seeking reformation of her automobile policy with Allstate so as to include UIM coverage. Both parties moved for summary judgment. The court denied Mrs. Osborne’s motion but granted summary judgment for Allstate. Mrs. Osborne appeals. We reverse and remand.

Prior to 1988, Mrs. Osborne was the named insured under a policy with Allstate. In 1988, Mrs. Osborne married Charles Osborne and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ballenger v. BowenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
  2. Garris v. Cincinnati InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1984
  3. Hanover Insurance v. Horace Mann InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
  4. Link v. School District of Pickens CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
  5. Hite v. Thomas & Howard Co. of Florence, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1991

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Butler v. Unisun InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
  2. Floyd v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
  3. Thomas v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
  4. Croft Ex Rel. Estate of Croft v. Old Republic InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
  5. Progressive Casualty Insurance v. LeachmanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API