Progressive Casualty Insurance v. Leachman
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Chief Justice TOAL:
The Honorable David C. Norton of the United States District Court, District of South Carolina, certified questions to this Court asking whether an insurer made a meaningful offer of under insured motorist coverage (“UIM”).
Factual / Procedural Background
In April 2001, Louis Leachman (“Leachman”) purchased an automobile insurance policy from Progressive Casualty Insurance Company (“Progressive”). Leachman purchased a $300,000 combined single limits liability policy. Leachman selected UIM coverage by marking a line designated $100,000 / $300,000 / $50,000 on the offer form. He…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Wannamaker Ex Rel. Estate of WannamakerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
- Butler v. Unisun InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
- Garris v. Cincinnati InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1984
- Hanover Insurance v. Horace Mann InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
- Osborne v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Floyd v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
- Croft Ex Rel. Estate of Croft v. Old Republic InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
- Wiegand v. United States Automobile Ass'nSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
- Grinnell Corp. v. WoodSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
- Ray v. AustinSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.