Legal Opinion

Progressive Casualty Insurance v. Leachman

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided January 10, 2005No. 25919PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Chief Justice TOAL:

The Honorable David C. Norton of the United States District Court, District of South Carolina, certified questions to this Court asking whether an insurer made a meaningful offer of under insured motorist coverage (“UIM”).

Factual / Procedural Background

In April 2001, Louis Leachman (“Leachman”) purchased an automobile insurance policy from Progressive Casualty Insurance Company (“Progressive”). Leachman purchased a $300,000 combined single limits liability policy. Leachman selected UIM coverage by marking a line designated $100,000 / $300,000 / $50,000 on the offer form. He…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Wannamaker Ex Rel. Estate of WannamakerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
  2. Butler v. Unisun InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
  3. Garris v. Cincinnati InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1984
  4. Hanover Insurance v. Horace Mann InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
  5. Osborne v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Floyd v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
  2. Croft Ex Rel. Estate of Croft v. Old Republic InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
  3. Wiegand v. United States Automobile Ass'nSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
  4. Grinnell Corp. v. WoodSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
  5. Ray v. AustinSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API