Legal Opinion
Salinero v. Pon
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 1, 1981No. Civ. 46752PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NEWSOM, J.
This is an appeal from a summary judgment dismissing appellant’s personal injury action against respondent Gene W. Lam, and a judgment entered upon a subsequent motion for nonsuit in favor of respondents Harold L. and Anna R. Pon, owners of the building, in the same action. The pertinent facts are as follows.
The Pons are owners of a five- and six-story apartment building containing 21 rental units located at 269 Hanover Street, Oakland, purchased by them in 1971. The building was designed by respondent Lam, an architect, and completed in 1969.
In July 1975, Mrs. Pon requested…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Brown v. MerloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Agricultural Labor Relations Board v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- County of Alameda v. CarlesonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Elmore v. American Motors Corp.California Supreme Court · 1969
- Van Arsdale v. HollingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Elsner v. UvegesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- Zapata v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Horton v. Goldminer's DaughterUtah Supreme Court · 1989
- Barnhouse v. City of PinoleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- In RE CITY OF NEW YORK v. AgniCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.