Puter v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation Act
Connecticut Superior Court
1Opinion of the CourtShapiro, J.
This is an appeal from a decision of the unemployment commissioner which denied benefits because of the plaintiff’s unavailability for work. The question before the court is whether there was error in so holding.
The plaintiff commenced working for the state of Connecticut in 1933 and so continued through June 11, 1959, but was paid his salary to July 8, 1959, owing to accrued vacation. As of July 8,1959, at age sixty-six, he voluntarily retired from employment with the state in order to take advantage of his pension rights. Under the provisions of General Statutes § 5-105, he could have…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Reger v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
- Leclerc v. AdministratorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
- Baldassaris v. EganSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1949
- Mishaw v. Fairfield NewsConnecticut Superior Court · 1944
3Cited by4 opinions
- Denby v. Board of Review of the Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1977
- Mancini v. AdministratorConnecticut Superior Court · 1963
- Micca v. AdministratorConnecticut Superior Court · 1965
- Stelmach v. AdministratorConnecticut Superior Court · 1963