Legal Opinion
Denby v. Board of Review of the Industrial Commission
Utah Supreme Court
Decided July 11, 1977No. 14841PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MAUGHAN, Justice.
Plaintiff, a claimant for unemployment compensation benefits, appeals from a decision of the Board of Review affirming the decision of an Appeals Referee. The board found the decision of the referee fair, unbiased, and supported by competent evidence. The benefits were denied on the grounds claimant had voluntarily left his employment without good cause (Sec. 35-4-5(a)), and he did not meet “availability” requirements of Sec. 35 — 4—4(c), for eligibility.
We affirm. All statutory references are to U.C.A.1953.
Claimant, age 64, was last employed as a clerk for the United States…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Krauss v. A. & M. KARAGHEUSIAN, INC.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
- Stevenson v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
- Texas Employment Commission v. HolbergTexas Supreme Court · 1969
- Claim of SappIdaho Supreme Court · 1954
- Fleiszig v. Board of Review of the Division of Unemployment Compensation of the Department of LaborIllinois Supreme Court · 1952
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Continental Oil Co. v. Board of Review of Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1977
- Gray v. Department of Employment SecurityUtah Supreme Court · 1984
- London v. Board of Review of the W. Va. Dept. of Employment SecurityWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1978
- Employment SEC. Com'n of Wyoming v. BryantWyoming Supreme Court · 1985
- Gibson v. Board of Review of the Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1985
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.