Legal Opinion
Micca v. Administrator
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided February 10, 1965No. File 140267PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShapiro, J.
This is an appeal by the plaintiff from a decision of an unemployment commissioner holding that he was not making reasonable efforts to find suitable work within the meaning of General Statutes § 31-235 (2) and that he was therefore ineligible for benefits. The question for decision is whether the commissioner’s conclusion is unreasonable, arbitrary and illegal.
The plaintiff was employed as a general manager of an automobile sales agency. Since his separation from that employment, he had planned to engage in the used-car business on his own and, since that date, he had acquired a commitment…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Waterbury Savings Bank v. DanaherSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
- Leclerc v. AdministratorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
- Baldassaris v. EganSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1949
- Puter v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActConnecticut Superior Court · 1960
3Cited by8 opinions
- Holman Enterprise Tobacco Warehouse v. CarterKentucky Supreme Court · 1976
- Johnson v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985
- In Re the Determination of the Unemployment Insurance Liability of Balhorn-Moyle Petroleum Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
- Ertman v. FusariDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1977
- Earthgrains Bakery Group, Inc. v. Mississippi Department of Employment SecurityMississippi Supreme Court · 2014
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.