Leclerc v. Administrator
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtBaldwin, J.
This is an appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment of the Superior Court dismissing her appeal from an award of the unemployment commissioner which denied benefits because o£ her unavailability for work.
The finding is not subject to correction. The facts follow: The plaintiff is a married woman living with her husband and two young children. She had been working as a drill press operator in a factory in Hartford. Her hours of employment were from 3:30 in the afternoon until midnight. On March 2, 1949, she was laid off for lack of work. On March 13 she registered for work. At the same time,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Waterbury Savings Bank v. DanaherSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
- Reger v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
- Ford Motor Co. v. Unemployment Compensation CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
- Baldassaris v. EganSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1949
- Mills v. South Carolina Unemployment Compensation CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1944
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- In Re WatsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Texas Employment Commission v. HaysTexas Supreme Court · 1962
- Unemployment Compensation Commission v. TomkoSupreme Court of Virginia · 1951
- Swanson v. Minneapolis-Honeywell Regulator Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- Schettino v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.