Legal Opinion

Stelmach v. Administrator

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided May 21, 1963No. File 28700Published

1Opinion of the CourtHouse, J.

The plaintiff has appealed from the denial of his application for unemployment compensation benefits. The record discloses that he was employed by the state of Connecticut from 1927 to 1962 and left his employment voluntarily when he reached the age where he would be eligible for a state pension. His accrued vacation and terminal leave expired on April 1,1962.

The finding of the commissioner indicates that “the claimant’s search for work, as recounted by him, could have been conducted in a period of time varying from a few hours to a day each week. In view of his age and the state of health,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lanyon v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
  2. Almada v. AdministratorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
  3. Ogozalek v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActConnecticut Superior Court · 1960
  4. Puter v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActConnecticut Superior Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API