Legal Opinion
Mancini v. Administrator
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided July 10, 1963No. File 27110PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShapiro, J.
The claim of the plaintiff for unemployment compensation benefits came before the administrator of the Unemployment Compensation Act, who denied him benefits, among others who had also applied. The matter then came before a panel of three commissioners, which, on October 30, 1961, decided that the plaintiff was entitled to benefits, thereby reversing the administrator. This is an appeal by the employer from the decision rendered by the said panel.
The administrator had concluded that (1) the plaintiff’s unemployment was due to the existence of a labor dispute at the premises at which he was…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Lanyon v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
- Reger v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
- Horowitz v. F. E. Spencer Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1945
- Leclerc v. AdministratorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
- Baldassaris v. EganSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1949
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Hill v. Board of ReviewWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1981
- Ex Parte McCleneySupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
- Washington Post Co. v. District Unemployment Compensation BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977
- Ventress v. RiceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
- Holmes v. RiceCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1972
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.