Legal Opinion
Sanguinetti v. City Council
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 22, 1965No. Civ. 10824PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VAN DYKE, J. †
This is an appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Joaquin County discharging an alternative writ of mandate. Proceedings in the trial court were commenced by appellants, as petitioners, by the filing on December 1, 1961, of a petition for a writ of mandate enjoining the respondent, Redevelopment Agency of the City of Stockton, from executing the official redevelopment plan for “West End Urban Renewal Project No. 1" and commanding the respondent, City Council of the City of Stockton, to repeal and rescind Ordinance No. 686-C.S. of the City of Stockton which approved…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In Re Redevelopment Plan for Bunker Hill v. GoldmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- Redevelopment Agency v. HayesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Fellom v. Redevelopment AgencyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Berggren v. MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
3Cited by8 opinions
- Friends of Mammoth v. Town of Mammoth Lakes Redevelopment AgencyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Card v. Community Redevelopment Agency of South PasadenaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Huntington Park Redevelopment Agency v. DuncanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- City of Las Vegas Downtown Redevelopment Agency v. PappasNevada Supreme Court · 2003
- Morgan v. Community Redevelopment AgencyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.