Legal Opinion

Dublin Distributors, Inc. v. Edward & John Burke, Ltd.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided December 29, 1952PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

IRVING R. KAUFMAN, District Judge.

The defendants have moved as follows:(1) To dismiss the complaint herein for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted;(2) For an order directing plaintiff to serve an amended complaint stating its claim in separate counts;(3) For a more definite statement pursuant to Rule 12(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.

Plaintiff’s complaint alleges an action pursuant to the Sherman and Clayton Acts, Title 15 U.S.C.A. §§ 2, 14, 15, based on the following facts: Plaintiff is a New York corporation engaged in the business of a wholesale…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. D. R. Wilder Manufacturing Co. v. Corn Products Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. Westmoreland Asbestos Co. v. Johns-Manville Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1939
  3. Beegle v. ThomsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1943
  4. Brosious v. Pepsi-Cola Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1946
  5. Myers v. Shell Oil Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1951

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Kinnear-Weed Corp. v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954
  2. Alexander v. Texas CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1957
  3. Arcade Steam Laundry v. BassDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
  4. Keco Industries, Inc. v. Borg-Warner CorporationDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1971
  5. Miller Motors, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1957

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API