Legal Opinion
Beegle v. Thomson
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided November 6, 1943No. 8334PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LINDLEY, District Judge.
Plaintiff questions the propriety of a judgment two-fold in character. Its complaint consisted of five counts, the first of which charged that Sharon Steel Company, as manufacturer and vendor, and Thomson, trustee for the Chicago & North Western Ry. Company, as user, had infringed Claims 1, 2, 3 and'4 of' patent to Beegle, 1,737,908, covering a timber anchor iron, designed to prevent or retard splitting and checking of the timber in which it is placed. The other counts charged only the Steel Company; the second averring breach of an assumed contract not to infringe;…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Keogh v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- American Banana Co. v. United Fruit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Exhibit Supply Co. v. Ace Patents Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- International Shoe Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Westmoreland Asbestos Co. v. Johns-Manville Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1939
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Julius Nagler v. Admiral CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
- United States v. Borden Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Chicago Title Insurance v. Great Western Financial Corp.California Supreme Court · 1968
- Christy v. PetrusSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
- Kainz v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1952
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.