Legal Opinion
Kinnear-Weed Corp. v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided July 21, 1954No. 14777PublishedCited by 67 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RIVES, Circuit Judge.
The complaint was based upon five separate claims: (1) infringement of patents, (2) violation of a confidential relationship, (3) unjust enrichment, (4) unfair competition, (5) for the recovery of threefold damages 1 for violation of Section 2 of the Sherman Act. 2 Upon this appeal we are concerned only with the last claim, the one for violation of the antitrust or monopoly laws. That claim was presented by paragraph 12 of the complaint.2 3 The district court sustained the defendant’s motion to strike said paragraph 12, and, pursuant to Rule 54(b), Federal Rules of Civil…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Apex Hosiery Co. v. LeaderSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- D. R. Wilder Manufacturing Co. v. Corn Products Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Feddersen Motors, Inc. v. WardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1950
- Glenn Coal Co. v. Dickinson Fuel Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1934
- Maltz v. SaxCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1943
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by67 opinions
- Karen Renee Augustus, a Minor, by Charles A. Augustus, Her Father, and Next Friend v. The Board of Public Instruction of Escambia County, FloridaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
- Julius Nagler v. Admiral CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
- Kenneth Lehrman v. Gulf Oil CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Havoco of America, Ltd. v. Shell Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
- Kenneth Lehrman v. Gulf Oil CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.