Legal Opinion
Westmoreland Asbestos Co. v. Johns-Manville Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 6, 1939PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MANDELBAUM, District Judge.
The relief sought by the defendants is divided up into four sections. The court will consider each separately.
Section 1.
The defendants move pursuant to Rule 12(b) (6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, to dismiss the complaint as to the plaintiffs, W. G. Kuehn, Inc., and William G. Kuehn individually on the ground that each plaintiff fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.
The action is to recover treble damages from the defendants for conspiracy to eliminate competition and to create an interstate monopoly;…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Green v. Victor Talking MacH. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
- United Copper Securities Co. v. Amalgamated Copper Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1916
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Timetrust, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1939
- Gerli v. Silk Ass'n of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1929
- Moog v. Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1939
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Karseal Corporation v. Richfield Oil CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
- Conference of Studio Unions v. Loew's Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
- Productive Inventions, Inc., a Corporation v. Trico Products Corporation, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
- Gaf Corporation v. Circle Floor Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- H. W. Martens and Robert A. Maurin, Jr. v. Carl F. Barrett, B. C. Farcell and the Texas CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.