Legal Opinion
Schwartzbach v. Thompson
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided August 16, 1943No. 97PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CAYTON, Associate Judge.
The trial judge predicated his finding and.judgment on a memorandum opinion which he filed in the case and which has *625proven helpful on this appeal. It has by stipulation of counsel been designated as the statement on appeal.
On the night in question plaintiff’s automobile was lawfully parked for the night, and while so parked was run into by an automobile owned by defendant and operated by one Gladys Benford.
Plaintiff depended upon that part of the Financial Responsibility Act for this District,1 which provides in part: “Whenever any motor vehicle * * * shall be…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Casey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Rosenberg v. MurrayCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
- Bryne v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
- Hiscox v. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
- Forrester v. JermanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1937
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- LeGrand v. Insurance Company of North AmericaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1968
- Lancaster v. CanuelDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1963
- Haw v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., and to Use of GiacomoCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
- Roger MacHanic v. Kate StoreyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1963
- Andrews v. FornessDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1971
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.