Legal Opinion
Haw v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., and to Use of Giacomo
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided January 16, 1950No. 10100PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WASHINGTON, Circuit Judge.
Joseph P. Giacomo was a foreman employed by Mace Properties, Inc., on an extensive building job being conducted by that company on its own land in Arlington, Virginia. The Haw Company, which was in the contracting business, and had a long-standing business relationship with Mace, had agreed with Mace to supply certain equipment, including bulldozers with operators, and to do the excavation work. While the exact nature of the agreement is not clear, it appears that the work here in question was paid for at a stipulated sum per man-hour (of equipment use). In any event…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Standard Oil Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Merlo v. Public Service Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1942
- Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Feitig v. ChalkleySupreme Court of Virginia · 1946
- Denton v. Yazoo & Mississippi Valley RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Rea, Administratrix v. FordSupreme Court of Virginia · 1957
- American Marietta Co. v. GriffinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1964
- Gebremdhin v. Avis Rent-A-Car System, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
- Beegle v. Restaurant Management, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
- Roger MacHanic v. Kate StoreyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1963
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.