Legal Opinion

Forrester v. Jerman

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided April 12, 1937No. 6797PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGroner, J.

This is an automobile injury case. Appellant sued appellees to recover damages for the loss of his wife’s services resulting from injuries -she received in December, 1935, when struck by one of appellees’ automobiles. The particular circumstances under which the injury occurred are not in point, since negligence in the operation of the automobile is tacitly conceded. The single question we are asked to decide is whether, under section 3 of an act of Congress called the Automobile Financial Responsibility Law (49 Stat. 166 [D.C.Code Supp. II 1936, T. 6, § 255b]), the owner of an automobile who…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Young v. MasciSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Grant v. KnepperNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
  3. Kerns v. LewisMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Bradford v. SargentCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  5. Curry v. StevensonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1928

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Frederick O. Gaither v. Charles R. Myers and American Motorist Insurance Co., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
  2. Rosenberg v. MurrayCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
  3. David M. Williams v. Rawlings Truck Line, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965
  4. Schwartzbach v. ThompsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1943
  5. Rice v. SimmonsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1947

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API