Legal Opinion
Rosenberg v. Murray
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided November 12, 1940No. 7502PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGroner, C. J.
In 1937 appellees were injured in an automobile collision in Washington City. They brought this action on the ground that their injuries were caused by the negligence of an agent in driving a car owned by appellant.
At the close of all the evidence appellant moved for binding instructions. This motion was denied, and a verdict and judgment for appellees followed. Although appellant did not have a certificate of title, there was, perhaps, sufficient evidence that he owned the offending vehicle and likewise sufficient evidence of the driver’s negligence. The only substantial question for…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Casey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Curry v. StevensonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1928
- Forrester v. JermanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1937
- Simon v. City Cab Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1935
- Peabody v. Marlboro Implement Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1934
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Ross v. HartmanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1943
- Ora Greene Hudson, Administratrix of the Estate of Garland Hudson, Deceased v. David Lazarus, Samuel Juster and Calvin JusterCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954
- Edouard Legille v. C. Marshall Dann, Commissioner of PatentsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
- Frederick O. Gaither v. Charles R. Myers and American Motorist Insurance Co., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
- Myers v. GaitherDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1967
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.