Legal Opinion
Lancaster v. Canuel
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided August 22, 1963No. 3238PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MYERS, Associate Judge.
This is an appeal by the Lancasters, husband and wife, from a judgment non ob-stante veredicto in favor of appellees Canuel and Hunting Towers Pharmacy, Inc., a corporation, after a jury trial iri which the Lancasters as plaintiffs secured a verdict for damages arising out of a motor accident involving their car and a vehicle owned by Canuel and driven by one Vernon Cooke, an employee of the pharmacy.
The Lancasters were residents of the District of Columbia. The collision took place at an intersection in the District about 11:30 p. m. The corporate appellee operated a…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Rosenberg v. MurrayCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
- Hiscox v. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
- Park Transfer Co. v. Lumbermens Mut. Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1944
- Mason v. Automobile Finance Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
- Schwartzbach v. ThompsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1943
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- District of Columbia v. DavisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
- Camacho v. 1440 Rhode Island Avenue Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- Leiken v. WilsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
- Henley v. Prince George's CountyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1985
- Singer v. DoyleDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1967
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.