Legal Opinion

Casey v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 9, 1928No. 500PublishedCited by 208 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holmes

The petitioner, Casey, was convicted upon two counts of an indictment, the first of which charged him with the purchase of three and four-tenths grains of morphine not in or from the original stamped package, at Seattle, within the jurisdiction of the Court. The conviction was sustained by the Circuit Court of Appeals. 20 F. (2d) 752. A writ of certiorari was granted by this Court.

Here the second count was admitted by the Government to be bad, so that the only matter to be considered is whether the conviction can be sustained upon the first. It is argued that the evidence is not enough.' —…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. Jin Fuey MoySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Yee Hem v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Child Labor Tax CaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  4. Luria v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  5. United States v. DoremusSupreme Court of the United States · 1919

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by208 opinions

  1. Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Patterson v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Sorrells v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. Turner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Tot v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943

203 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API