Rhine v. Ellen
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court, Eleventh Judicial District, El Dorado County. The Court gave the defendant judgment for his costs, but not for any moneys expended by him on the property. The plaintiff appealed. The other facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court, Sawyer, C. J. :
On the first of March, 1866, the plaintiff, being in possession of a tract of land and a gold bearing quartz vein situate in the County of El Dorado, and known as the “Hermitage Ranch” and “Hermitage Quartz Mine,” conveyed the same, by deed duly executed and acknowledged, to Elle Ellen, of said county, defendant in this action, James E. Eddy, of San Francisco, and Charles Harris, Charles S. Maguire, and Benjamin Dickerson, Jr., of the State of Massachusetts, in the proportions of one half to Dickerson, and one eighth each to the other grantees. The conveyance is…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- M'Crea v. PurmortCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1836
- Bowen v. BellNew York Supreme Court · 1823
- Belden v. SeymourSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1831
- Shephard v. LittleNew York Supreme Court · 1817
- Peck v. VandenbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Brison v. BrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Frink v. RoeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Gardner v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Bolles v. SachsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
- Futurecraft Corp. v. Clary Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1962
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.