Bolles v. Sachs
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the district court for Hen-nepin county, where the action was tried before Lochren, J., and a jury, and a verdict of $2,958 rendered for plaintiff.
1Opinion of the Court
Dickinson, J.1
Prior to September 26, 1885, the plaintiff and another person, as copartners, had been engaged at Minneapolis in the sale of bottled mineral water and other goods, which they had been .accustomed to procure from the defendants. At that date, the partnership being indebted to the defendants to the amount of some $9,500, the plaintiff in behalf of his firm sold and assigned to the defendants .all of their merchandise, trade fixtures, and accounts for the expressed -consideration of $9,500. This was afterwards ratified by the plaintiff’s partner. At the same time, and, as the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- M'Crea v. PurmortCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1836
- Chicago & Great Eastern Railway Co. v. DaneNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
- Campbell v. A. Lambert & Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1884
- Furnell v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1873
- Goodspeed v. FullerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1858
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- East Line & Red River Railroad v. ScottTexas Supreme Court · 1888
- Skagerberg v. Blandin Paper Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
- Abraham v. County of HennepinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1897
- Bussard v. College of Saint Thomas, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.