Bullard v. Stone
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Tehama County, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Searls, C.
This action is brought to recover damages for violation of a contract to sell and deliver a quantity of wheat. Cause tried by a jury. Verdict and judgment in favor of plaintiff for $2,000. A motion for new trial was made and denied. The appeal is from the judgment and from an order denying a new trial.
On or about the 5th of December, 1882, the defendant entered into a contract with plaintiff for the sale and delivery by the former to the latter of 7,976 sacks of wheat, aggregating 1,097,161 pounds.
At the date of the contract 4,400 sacks, containing 602,800 pounds, were at Squaw…
2Cited by20 opinions
- In Re Estate of FeltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- State Ex Rel. Snidow v. State Board of EqualizationMontana Supreme Court · 1932
- Wimer v. SimmonsOregon Supreme Court · 1895
- International Harvester Co. of America v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1919
- Redhead Bros. v. Wyoming Cattle Investment Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1905
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.