Roberts v. Cooper
Supreme Court of the United States
This case was brought up, by writ of error, from the Circuit Court of the United States for the district of Michigan. It was the same case which was before this court at December term, 1855, and is reported in 18 Howard, 173. A venire de novo having been ordered, the case came up again for trial, on the circuit, in June, 1856. The result was a verdict and judgment in favor of Cooper, the lessor of the plaintiff' in the original action.
Read the full summary
This case was brought up, by writ of error, from the Circuit Court of the United States for the district of Michigan. It was the same case which was before this court at December term, 1855, and is reported in 18 Howard, 173. A venire de novo having been ordered, the case came up again for trial, on the circuit, in June, 1856. The result was a verdict and judgment in favor of Cooper, the lessor of the plaintiff' in the original action. The bill of exceptions stated that an agreed state of facts, dated Washington city, April 17th, 1854, signed by S. E. Yin-ton for plaintiff, and Truman Smith…
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Grier
Cooper, the plaintiff below, brought-this action of ejectment to recover a part of section No. 16, in township 50 north, range 39 west,,lying within the mineral district south of Lake Superior, in the State of Michigan. He claimed under the State of Michigan, and the defendant for. the Minnesota Mining Company, under a right of pre-emption from the United States. The case was tried in the Circuit Court, and a verdict and judgment rendered for the defendants. On a writ of error to this court, the judgment of the court below was reversed, and the record remitted for further proceedings, in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- American Insurance v. 356 Bales of CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
- Ex Parte Sibbald v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1838
- The Santa MariaSupreme Court of the United States · 1825
- Corning v. the Troy Iron and Nail FactorySupreme Court of the United States · 1854
- Backus v. ByronMichigan Supreme Court · 1857
3Cited by124 opinions
- White v. MurthaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- Central Soya Company, Inc. v. Geo. A. Hormel & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Kingsbury v. BucknerSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Petition of United States Steel Corporation, as Owner of the Steamship Cedarville, and the Petition of Den Norske Amerikalinje A/s, as Owner of the M/v Topdalsfjord, for Exoneration From or Limitation of Liability. Barbara J. Fuhrman, Administratrix of the Estate of Arthur J. Fuhrman, Deceased, Claimants-Appellants v. United States Steel Corporation and Den Norske Amerikalinje A/s, United States Steel Corporation and Den Norske Amerikalinje A/s, Cross-Appellants v. Billy R. Holley, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1973
- Johnson v. Cadillac Motor Car Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1919
119 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.