Legal Opinion
Wilson v. Harlow
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided July 13, 1993No. 80097PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SUMMARY OF FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
WATT, Justice.
In an effort to encourage the development of cogeneration and small power production facilities, and to reduce the demand for fossil fuels, the United States Congress enacted the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 (“PURPA”), Pub.L. 95-617, 92 Stat. 3117 (codified as amended at 16 U.S.C. § 824a-3) 1 The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC”) was charged with promulgating rules implementing PURPA. 16 U.S.C. § 824a-3(a). One of the ways Congress chose to encourage the development of cogeneration and small power production…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Pepper v. LittonSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Hillsborough County v. Automated Medical Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Louisiana Pub. Serv. Comm'n v. FCCSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Ray v. Atlantic Richfield Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Resolution Trust Corp. v. GreerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- Smith Cogeneration Management, Inc. v. Corp. CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- Gay v. Hartford Underwriters Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- Centerpoint Energy, Inc. v. MILLER COUNTY CIRCUIT SECOND DIV.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
- In Re SemCrude L.P.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.