Sunday v. Moore
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.
— This is an action of forcible de-tainer, brought under the second subdivision of § 811 of the code (Rem. Comp. Stat.) [P. C. §7969]. The real property involved is situated in the city of Tacoma. The title to the property at the time of the transactions which gave rise to the controversy, and at the time of the trial in the court below, was in one Mary A. Lemon, a widow. On September 1, 1920, the appellant Amanda Truelove contracted to purchase the property for a consideration of $14,000, payable in part in installments,. The purchaser made the installment payments somewhat intermittently,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Gore v. AlticeWashington Supreme Court · 1903
- Chezum v. CampbellWashington Supreme Court · 1906
- Ridpath v. DeneeWashington Supreme Court · 1915
- Huston v. Big Bend Land Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1919
3Cited by6 opinions
- Forrester v. CookUtah Supreme Court · 1930
- Enbody v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1928
- Randolph v. HuschWashington Supreme Court · 1930
- Angel v. LadasWashington Supreme Court · 1927
- Seeley v. HoustonUtah Supreme Court · 1943
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.