Legal Opinion

Angel v. Ladas

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 2, 1927No. 20268. Department TwoPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

The plaintiff, Angel, commenced this action in the superior court for King county seeking recovery of damages from the defendant, Ladas. The theory of Angel’s claim of recovery, as .we understand his counsel, is that he was induced by Ladas to become his tenant by an oral agreement for the lease of his storeroom for a term of four years, commencing March 9,1923; that he then entered into the possession of the storeroom and expended a large sum in improving it for a restaurant, for which purpose he intended to use it, with the knowledge and acquiescence of Ladas; that Ladas refused to execute…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Phillips v. Port Townsend Lodge, No. 6Washington Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Northwest Bridge Co. v. Tacoma Shipbuilding Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Bond v. ChapmanWashington Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Gore v. AlticeWashington Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Ridpath v. DeneeWashington Supreme Court · 1915

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Randolph v. HuschWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Commercial Waterway District No. 1 v. LarsonWashington Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Woodbury v. BunkerUtah Supreme Court · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API