Randolph v. Husch
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtTolman, J.
— Tbis is an action in forcible detainer. Tbe plaintiff bad judgment below in accordance with tbe prayer of bis complaint, and tbe defendant has appealed.
Tbe governing facts are but little in dispute, and may be sufficiently summarized as follows: Tbe land involved is twenty acres of orchard, with no buildings thereon except a pump house. No one actually lived upon the land at any of the times here involved. For two years preceding the matters complained of, the respondent had possession and operated the orchard under an unacknowledged and unrecorded lease. In the latter part of December,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Gore v. AlticeWashington Supreme Court · 1903
- Meyer v. BeyerWashington Supreme Court · 1906
- Chezum v. CampbellWashington Supreme Court · 1906
- Dutcher v. SandersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
- Ridpath v. DeneeWashington Supreme Court · 1915
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Priestley Mining & Milling Co. v. Lenox Mining & Development Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1952
- Aeschliman v. ChrystWashington Supreme Court · 1957
- Allen Watkins & Janis Clark, Appellant's V. Esa ManagementCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2024
- Allen Watkins & Janis Clark, Appellant's V. Esa ManagementCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2024
- Woodbury v. BunkerUtah Supreme Court · 1940