Legal Opinion

Huston v. Big Bend Land Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 12, 1919No. 15035PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from a judgment of tlie superior court for Lincoln county, Carey, J., entered July 15, 1918, upon findings in favor of one of tbe defendants, in an action of forcible entry and detainer, tried on tbe merits to tbe court.

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

Tbe plaintiff, Huston, commenced tbis action in tbe superior court for Lincoln county as one of forcible entry, seeking restitution of bis possession of a ranch, situated in that county, wbicb be claims to bave been forcibly dispossessed of by tbe defendants; and also seeking recovery of damages tberefor from tbe defendants land company and Ken*131nedy. Trial upon the merits before the court without a jury resulted in findings and a judgment denying to the plaintiff any relief as against the defendant Kennedy, upon the ground that he had nothing to do with the forcible eviction of the plaintiff…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Big Bend Land Co. v. HustonWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Warburton v. DobleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  3. Roff v. DuaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
  4. State ex rel. Huston v. Big Bend Land Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1918

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sunday v. MooreWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Lees v. WardallCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1976
  3. KEATING-SMITH v. MUSTAFASupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API