Legal Opinion

Chezum v. Campbell

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 16, 1906No. 5956PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Honorable Eenley Bryan, Judge pro tempore_, entered March 18, 1905, upon, findings in favor of the defendants, dismissing an action of forcible entry and detainer, after a trial before the court without a jury.

1Opinion of the CourtCrow, J.

— This is an action of forcible detainer. Upon trial without a jury, the court made findings of fact, from which it appears that the lands in question are fenced in two parcels, with a traveled road running north and south between them; that on the eastern parcel is a small frame house which, during all the times in the findings mentioned and until the commencement of this action, was vacant; that for the calendar years of 1902, 1903 and 1904, one James Markwell held a lease of said lands, from the appellant Lydia E. Chezum; that said Markwell at no time resided thereon, hut that he exercised…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Emsley v. BennettSupreme Court of Iowa · 1873
  2. Conroy v. DuaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Gore v. AlticeWashington Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Redfield v. Utica & Syracuse Rail RoadNew York Supreme Court · 1851
  5. Lechler v. ChapinNevada Supreme Court · 1877

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Pioneer Irrigation District v. SmithIdaho Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Meyer v. BeyerWashington Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Monroe v. StaytWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Ridpath v. DeneeWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Sunday v. MooreWashington Supreme Court · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API