Legal Opinion

Ridenour v. Farm Bureau Ins. Co. of Nebraska

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1985No. 84-730PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCaporale, J.

Defendant, Farm Bureau Insurance Company of Nebraska, a mutual insurance company, appeals from the reformation of a policy of insurance issued by it so as to provide coverage for losses occasioned by the collapse of plaintiff Charles D. Ridenour’s hog confinement building. Farm Bureau’s assignment that the trial court erred in reforming the policy is meritorious; we therefore, without considering its other assignments of error, reverse and remand the cause with the direction that it be dismissed.

An action for reformation being equitable in nature, Farmers Coop. Assn. v. Klein, 196 Neb. 180,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Tobin v. Flynn & Larsen Implement Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Robinson v. Union Automobile InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Porrazzo v. Nabisco, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  4. Johnson v. StoverNebraska Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Heikes v. Farm Bureau Insurance Company of Neb.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1967

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Enchanted World Doll Museum v. BuskohlSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Bedrosky v. HinerNebraska Supreme Court · 1988
  3. J. J. Schaefer Livestock Hauling, Inc. v. Gretna State BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Records v. ChristensenNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Wiles v. MetzgerNebraska Supreme Court · 1991

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API