Legal Opinion

Bedrosky v. Hiner

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided October 21, 1988No. 87-071PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHastings, C.J.

Plaintiffs have appealed from the judgment of the district court which sustained the motion of the defendant for summary judgment. This was an action resulting from a fire in a building owned by the defendant, a portion of which was leased to the plaintiffs. Plaintiffs sought damages for destruction of their property.

In appellate review of a summary judgment, the court views the evidence in a light most favorable to the party against whom the judgment is granted and gives such party the benefit of all reasonable inferences deducible from the evidence. Wilson v. F & H Constr. Co., 229 Neb.…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Union Pacific Railroad v. Kaiser Agricultural Chemical Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Occidental Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Venco PartnershipNebraska Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Luschen Building Ass'n v. Fleming Companies, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Fisbeck v. Scherbarth, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1988
  5. State ex rel. Nebraska State Bar Ass'n v. DouglasNebraska Supreme Court · 1987

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Nebraska Public Power District, a Political Subdivision of the State of Nebraska v. Midamerican Energy CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
  2. Home Instead, Inc. v. David FloranceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
  3. New Light Co. v. Wells Fargo Alarm ServicesNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Landon v. PettijohnNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Daehnke v. Nebraska Department of Social ServicesNebraska Supreme Court · 1996

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API