Porrazzo v. Nabisco, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUSPENI, Judge.
This is an appeal from the Commissioner of Economic Security’s decision that relator voluntarily left his employment without good cause attributable to the employer. We reverse.
FACTS
Relator James J. Porrazzo was employed by respondent Nabisco, Inc. until he submitted his resignation on April 9, 1984. Porrazzo concedes that he voluntarily resigned, but asserts that his resignation was with good cause attributable to the employer. The Commissioner of Economic Security determined that the termination was without good cause.
On April 1, 1983, Porrazzo was promoted to the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- White v. Metropolitan Medical CenterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Lisa Marz v. Department of Employment ServicesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Zepp v. Arthur Treacher Fish & Chips, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Larson v. Department of Economic SecuritySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Johnson v. Wilson & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
3Cited by18 opinions
- Tru-Stone Corp. v. GutzkowCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- Ridenour v. Farm Bureau Ins. Co. of NebraskaNebraska Supreme Court · 1985
- Wetterhahn v. Kimm Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
- Portz v. Pipestone SkelgasCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Ryks v. Nieuwsma Livestock EquipmentCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.