Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Stover

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided August 10, 1984No. 83-329PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.

Plaintiff, Donald R. Johnson (hereinafter Johnson), brought this action against defendants Gay Stover, Robert Klimek, and Howard Shimon, seeking damages resulting from a trespass on Johnson’s land caused when defendants’ pivot irrigation system ran through Johnson’s fence and onto Johnson’s land.

The defendants’ answer alleged generally that named defendants Stover and Klimek had no interest in the land or pivot irrigation system; that Shimon was an owner of the land; and that there had been no trespass because the land onto which the pivot irrigation system had gone had been sold to Shimon by…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United Services Automobile Association v. HillsNebraska Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Olds v. JamisonNebraska Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Lippire v. EckelNebraska Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Story v. GammellNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
  5. CENTRAL CONSTRUCTION COMPANY v. OsbahrNebraska Supreme Court · 1970

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Newton v. BrownNebraska Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Van Pelt v. GreathouseNebraska Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Five Points Bank v. WhiteNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Brown v. United States Nat. Bank of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Ridenour v. Farm Bureau Ins. Co. of NebraskaNebraska Supreme Court · 1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API