Legal Opinion
Robinson v. Union Automobile Insurance
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided April 10, 1924No. 22682PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGood, J.
This is an action to reform an automobile insurance policy, so as to make it cover loss caused by collision, and to recover under the policy as reformed. Defendant admits the issuance of the policy, but denies that it covers, or was intended to cover, loss by collision. The erial resulted in a judgment for plaintiff, reforming the policy and awarding him judgment for the amount of his loss. Defendant appeals.
Was plaintiff entitled to a reformation of the policy? The correct answer to this question determines this appeal. There is little, if any, conflict in the evidence that is material to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Thompson v. Phenix InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Metzger v. . &198tna Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Bostwick v. Mutual Life Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
- Dolvin v. American Harrow Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- American Insurance v. NeibergerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1881
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Journal Co. v. General Accident, Fire & Life Assurance Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
- Ohio Casualty Ins. v. CallawayCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1943
- New York Life Ins. Co. v. McCrearyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
- Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n v. MilderNebraska Supreme Court · 1950
- Commercial Casualty Ins. Co. v. ConnelleeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.