Legal Opinion

State v. Kraushaar

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 24, 1991No. C4-89-1762PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

YETKA, Justice.

David Kraushaar, Jr., respondent, was convicted of second-degree criminal sexual conduct after a jury trial in Ramsey County District Court. The court of appeals reversed the conviction, holding:(1) that the state’s evidence was, as a matter of law, insufficient to sustain the determination that sexual contact occurred,(2) that the trial court prejudicially erred in admitting certain testimony by an expert on children’s drawings who had examined two drawings made by the complainant, and(3) that the trial court prejudicially erred (a) in letting the jury replay a…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  3. Lockhart v. NelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. State v. MyersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  5. State v. MacKSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. State v. A.R.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2013
  2. State v. ReedSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
  3. State v. VickSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
  4. Young v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1994
  5. State v. KendellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API